Dataset
Conflict processing networks: a directional analysis of stimulus-response compatibilities using MEG
- 1Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine INM-4, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany
- 2Ubiquitous Awareness and Intelligent Solutions Lab, Lanzhou University, China
- 3Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany
DOI: 10.12751/g-node.qm0apk BROWSE REPOSITORY BROWSE ARCHIVE DOWNLOAD ARCHIVE (ZIP 525 MiB)
Published 21 Dec. 2020 | License CC BY-SA 4.0
Description
The suppression of distracting information in order to focus on the actual cognitive goal is a key feature of executive functions. The present study provides detailed insights into the underlying neural mechanisms of the fronto-parietal attention network (FPAN) during conflict processing. In particular, the present study identifies the activated areas and their 1) causal interactions and directionality, 2) time courses and 3) activations at different frequency bands using MEG, which has not been studied in this way.
Keywords
| Neuroscience | Granger causality | conflict processing | attention network |References
- Brod G, Lindenberger U, Werkle-Bergner M, Shing YL. Differences in the neural signature of remembering schema-congruent and schema-incongruent events. Neuroimage. 2015;117: 358–366 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.086
- Iannaccone R, Hauser TU, Staempfli P, Walitza S, Brandeis D, Brem S. Conflict monitoring and error processing: New insights from simultaneous EEG–fMRI. Neuroimage. 2015;105: 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.028
- Ptak R. The Frontoparietal Attention Network of the Human Brain. Neurosci. 2012;18: 502–515 https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858411409051
- Wittfoth M, Buck D, Fahle M, Herrmann M. Comparison of two Simon tasks: Neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception. Neuroimage. 2006;32: 921–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.034
- Cohen MX, Ridderinkhof KR. EEG Source Reconstruction Reveals Frontal-Parietal Dynamics of Spatial Conflict Processing. Maurits NM, editor. PLoS One. 2013;8: e57293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057293
- Pastötter B, Hanslmayr S, T. Bäuml K-H. Conflict processing in the anterior cingulate cortex constrains response priming. Neuroimage. 2010;50: 1599–1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.095
- Hesse W, Möller E, Arnold M, Schack B. The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies. J Neurosci Methods. 2003;124: 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00366-7
- Simon JR, Small AM. Processing auditory information: Interference from an irrelevant cue. J Appl Psychol. 1969;53: 433–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028034
- Florin E, Gross J, Pfeifer J, Fink GR, Timmermann L. The effect of filtering on Granger causality based multivariate causality measures. Neuroimage. 2010;50: 577–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.050
- Harding IH, Yücel M, Harrison BJ, Pantelis C, Breakspear M. Effective connectivity within the frontoparietal control network differentiates cognitive control and working memory. Neuroimage. 2015;106: 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.039